Define criteria
Metrics aligned with the role and business objectives.
Results and evaluation
We verify
what has improved.
We measure before and after to clearly show the value of each intervention, including its limitations and possible regressions.
◎ Tailored to your context⚙ Practical approach▥ Explicit evaluation
EVALUATION TEMPLATE
No real metricsVerifiable comparison
Functional accuracy
Baseline → Reassessment
To be measuredConsistency
Variation across equivalent tasks
To be measuredHuman corrections
Review needed per task
To be measuredTime per task
Comparable conditions
To be measuredSource quality
Relevance and traceability
To be measuredCritical errors
Risks and regressions
To be measuredExample evaluation structure. Does not represent achieved results.
How we measure
Select tasks
Representative scenarios and explicit correctness criteria.
Evaluate the baseline
Record behaviour before intervention.
Apply the intervention
Documented changes and controlled conditions.
Repeat the evaluation
Comparable tasks and conditions.
Document results
Improvements, regressions, scope and limitations.
What we measure
Functional accuracy
Consistency
Human corrections
Time per task
Source quality
Cost per useful task
Procedures
Critical errors
No fabricated results.
We do not publish improvement percentages or client cases without measurement and authorisation. A real case must document the initial situation, intervention, methodology, results and limitations.
From data to decisions